The men are allegedly responsible for stealing millions in jewelry and other valuables in 43 burglaries in 25 towns across Massachusetts.
Whose fault is it anyway?
I was on the phone Tuesday morning with someone in the industry who mentioned that he had recently seen a live stage version of Whose Line Is It Anyway?, a British radio-cum-TV improvisational sketch comedy show that also had a run in the United States.
For those who haven’t seen it, the show involves four performers who participate in various improv games that are then scored by a host, though the points don’t mean anything and there aren’t any real prizes.
While no one except its creators know the exact origin of the show’s name, my guess would be it was called Whose Line Is it Anyway? because improve can get chaotic, leaving performers to look at each other and wonder, whose turn is it to keep this sketch going?
The diamond industry currently finds itself running up against a similar question mark when it comes to pricing. Rough prices are higher than they should be, polished demand is sluggish and many manufacturers in the middle can’t make money.
Shortly after my piece on the Indian diamond industry ran Tuesday, a colleague forwarded me an excellent guest blog by Sanjay Kothari, the former multi-term chairman of India’s Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council (GJEPC), that was published on a site called GemKonnect. GemKonnect is headed by Vinod Kuriyan, a journalist who has covered the industry for a long time and is extremely knowledgeable.
For those of you who are unaware, Kothari’s post goes a long way toward explaining why the price of rough diamonds has continued to go up even as polished prices have dropped and global demand for diamond jewelry has slowed.
Kothari writes that while many seek to blame the diamond mining companies, much of what ails the industry has to do with the “shortsighted business models” of the diamond cutting and polishing companies.
They, as Kothari writes and others have told me, have been buying overpriced rough and selling it at, in Kothari’s words, “laughably low prices” without caring. They just want to show turnover so they can continue getting credit from the banks, which they then sink into other industries (real estate, the stock market, etc.) that make them money.
So whose fault is that, then?
Like Kothari, I don’t put the lion’s share of the blame on De Beers, or any of the other mining companies for that matter.
What is something, anything, worth, be it a handbag, a car or a diamond? The answer is, whatever people are willing to pay for it.
Diamond cutting and polishing companies are
De Beers is a business. De Beers is not your friend.
What’s more, De Beers is not the De Beers of years gone by. The Oppenheimer family sold their stake in the diamond mining company in 2012 and De Beers is now one piece of a large public company, Anglo American. Anglo, like every public company on the planet, answers to its shareholders and De Beers is its most profitable subsidiary. Anglo’s going to do what it can to keep it that way.
That being said, I also agree with Kothari that the mining companies aren’t completely blameless in this scenario. They, like the cutters and polishers, are risking the long-term health of the industry for short-term gain.
Kothari offers a very common sense solution to the problem though it involves something that is not, shall we say, one of the diamond industry’s strong suits: working together.
Kothari suggests having all players in the industry pitch in to promote diamonds, thus helping alleviate the drop in demand; having all the mining companies cut back on mine output; and having diamond manufacturers cut back on the amount of rough they buy.
It seems that everyone in this situation shares a bit of the blame, so it’s only right that everyone step up to keep the show going.
The Latest
“Horizon” invites individuals to explore the limitless possibilities that lie ahead, said the brand.
The jeweler credits its recent “Be Love” campaign and ongoing brand revamp for its 17 percent jump in sales.
Meet Ben Claus—grand prize winner of For the Love of Jewelers 2023 Fall Design Challenge.
The co-founder of Lewis Jewelers was also the longtime mayor of the city of Moore.
Elvis Presley gifted this circa 1967 gold and diamond watch to Dodie Marshall, his co-star in “Easy Come, Easy Go.”
With Ho Brothers, you can unlock your brand's true potential and offer customers the personalized jewelry experiences they desire.
Concerns about rising prices, politics, and global conflicts continue to dampen consumer outlook.
May’s birthstone is beloved for its rich green hue and its versatility.
Jacqui Larsson joins Opsydia with nearly two decades of experience in the industry.
Last month in Dallas, David Walton pushed another jeweler, David Ettinger, who later died.
The “Tiffany Céleste” collection reimagines designer Jean Schlumberger’s interpretations of the universe.
The brand also created a 100-carat lab-grown diamond necklace in honor of its centennial.
Tim Schlick has been promoted from his previous position as COO.
It’s the second year for the event, slated to take place in October in Toronto.
Supplier Spotlight Sponsored by GIA
Sales will be paused while the relocation takes place over the next few months.
“SIS x MISA Denim and Diamonds” is a collaboration between the designer and celebrity stylist Misa Hylton.
The retailer is moving to a newly designed space in the same shopping center.
Gifts that are unique and thoughtful are top of mind this year, according to the annual survey.
The necklace is featured in the brand’s “Rebel Heart” campaign starring Adam Levine and Behati Prinsloo.
The two organizations will host a joint event, “Converge,” in September 2025.
Big changes appear to be on the horizon for the diamond miner and its parent company, Anglo American.
Padis succeeds Lisa Bridge, marking the first time the organization has had two women board presidents in a row.
The Royal Oak Perpetual Calendar "John Mayer" was celebrated at a star-studded party in LA last week.
The announcement came as the company reported a 23 percent drop in production in Q1.