The announcement coincided with its full-year results, with growth driven by its jewelry brands.
Costco Ordered to Pay Damages in Tiffany Case
A federal jury in New York issued a $5.5 million partial verdict for unlawful profits but is still deciding on punitive damages.
New York--A federal jury in New York awarded Tiffany & Co. $5.5 million in damages last week in part one of a two-part verdict being handed down in its case against Costco Wholesale Corp.
Relatively speaking, it’s a tiny amount of money for a jewelry retailer that recorded $4.1 billion in global sales last year, and for a massive wholesale club that rang up more than $100 billion.
But it’s a big message for the jeweler that, like all retailers, is fighting for every consumer dollar in an increasingly competitive marketplace and that, perhaps, sees protecting its venerable 179-year-old brand as key to maintaining its edge.
It’s a case that’s been labeled a publicity stunt and called a “waste of time” but, in the end, ultimately has a two-prong effect for Tiffany.
Emily Miao, a partner at McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP who specializes in intellectual property law, said the case sends a message to the jewelry industry about using the term “Tiffany setting.” That message is: Don’t use it.
RELATED CONTENT: What the Tiffany Ruling Means for the Jewelry IndustryTiffany essentially had already won this case more than a year ago when U.S. District Judge Laura Taylor Swain not only granted Tiffany’s motions for summary judgment on claims of trademark infringement and trademark counterfeiting, but also threw out Costco’s counterclaim that “Tiffany setting” had become a generic term that could be applied to any engagement ring setting created in the same multiple slender-prong style as a Tiffany ring.
It could have ended there, but Miao said that Tiffany is “using this case to un-do what has happened to their (trade)mark.”
“Now they have a way to segue into changing the jewelry industry’s behavior by using the Costco case. It is a publicity stunt, in that sense,” she said.
The case also has kept Tiffany & Co. top-of-mind for consumers, particularly those deciding if, and where, they’d like to buy a Tiffany ring.
The jury handed down its verdict last Thursday in New York federal court, putting Costco’s profits from the sales of rings with a “Tiffany setting” at $3.7 million and adding $1.8 million for what it determined as benefits that Costco derived from the ring sales.
In a statement shared with National Jeweler on Friday, Costco said it is not commenting on the decision because the jury’s deliberations are continuing.
The partial verdict is nearly, but
As of Monday morning, the jury was still deliberating punitive damages in the case; punitive damages are those that serve to punish the offending party in a case.
Miao said the bar for awarding punitive damages is high in New York state, and she put Tiffany’s chance of recovering any more money at 50/50.
But, again, “money’s not really relevant here,” she said. “If it was, Tiffany would have settled a long time ago.”
“This is a good decision for Tiffany. This will help them sell more rings and jewelry. (Because), if you want a Tiffany ring, you’ve got to go to Tiffany to buy it.”
The Latest
Looking ahead, the retailer said it sees “enormous potential” in Roberto Coin’s ability to boost its branded jewelry business.
Jewelry trade show veterans share strategies for engaging buyers, managing your time effectively, and packing the right shoes.
Despite the rising prices, consumers continue to seek out the precious metal.
This little guy’s name is Ricky and he just sold for more than $200,000 at Sotheby’s Geneva jewelry auction.
Though its website has been down for a week, Christie’s proceeded with its jewelry and watch auctions on May 13-14, bringing in nearly $80 million.
Despite the absence of “The Allnatt,” Sotheby’s Geneva jewelry auction totaled $34 million, with 90 percent of lots sold.
Tradeshow risks are real. Get tips to protect yourself before, during and after and gain safety and security awareness for your business.
Lilian Raji gives advice to designers on how to make the most of great publicity opportunities.
The mining company wants to divest its 70 percent holding in the Mothae Diamond Mine in an effort to streamline its portfolio.
Why do so many jewelers keep lines that are not selling? Peter Smith thinks the answer lies in these two behavioral principles.
The “Argyle Phoenix” sold for more than $4 million at the auction house’s second jewels sale.
The annual list recognizes young professionals making an impact in jewelry retail.
Owner David Mann is heading into retirement.
While overall sales were sluggish, the retailer said its non-bridal fine jewelry was a popular choice for Valentine’s Day.
The mining giant also wants to offload its platinum business as part of an overhaul designed to “unlock significant value.”
Christie's is selling one of the diamonds, moving forward with its Geneva jewelry auction despite the cyberattack that took down its website.
Retailers can customize and print the appraisal brochures from their store.
The move follows a price-drop test run in Q4 and comes with the addition of a “quality assurance card” from GIA for some loose diamonds.
The site has been down since Thursday evening, just ahead of its spring auctions.
The late former U.S. Secretary’s collection went for quadruple the sale’s pre-sale estimate.
Three fifth graders’ winning designs were turned into custom jewelry pieces in time for Mother’s Day.
Kimberly Adams Russell is taking over the role from her father, David Adams, marking the third generation to hold the title.
As a token of womanhood, this necklace depicts when Venus was born from the sea.
Show your mother some love with a piece of fine jewelry.
The company’s Easton location will remain open.
Brian D. Fleming of Carla Corporation was elected to serve a one-year term in the role.