The man was charged with theft, accused of ingesting the necklace while in a jewelry store in Auckland, New Zealand.
Judge Denies Signet’s Motion in Securities Fraud Lawsuit
Signet Jewelers sought to have one of the two claims brought against it by shareholders in a 2016 suit dismissed.

New York—Earlier this month, a New York federal judge denied Signet Jewelers Ltd.’s request to dismiss one of the two claims contained in a lawsuit brought against it by shareholders.
The Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, a pension fund, is the lead plaintiff in a purported securities class-action against Signet originally filed in 2016.
The lawsuit accuses the jewelry retailer of misrepresenting two aspects of the company: the health of its credit portfolio (which the company has since outsourced) and allegations of a culture of “pervasive” sexual harassment.
The sexual harassment aspect of the shareholder lawsuit relates to Jock, et al. v. Sterling Jewelers Inc., a subsidiary of Signet. That case was filed in March 2008 by several women accusing the company of discriminatory pay and promotion practices based on their gender.
Though the case itself contains no allegations of sexual harassment, documents eventually unsealed in connection to the case, and reported on by The Washington Post as well as other media outlets, painted a picture of a culture where women were objectified, disrespected and scared of retaliation, generating a lot of negative publicity for the retailer and, the shareholders noted in their lawsuit, sending Signet’s stock price plummeting.
Signet previously sought to have the entire shareholder lawsuit dismissed, but U.S. District Court Judge Colleen McMahon denied that motion in November 2018.
In May 2019, the retailer sought the dismissal of the claims relating to its company culture. It filed a motion for a judgement on the pleadings, which is when a party asks the court to rule in its favor based not on new evidence but interpretation of the law.
Signet asked the court to take a look at a March ruling from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in a case called Singh v. Cigna Corp.
In that case, a shareholder alleged that Cigna’s pamphlet about its code of ethics misled investors about its compliance with Medicare regulations, court documents show.
The code of ethics, which included statements about staying in compliance with the law and acting with integrity, was determined to be a “textbook example of puffery,” court papers state, meaning the statements were too general for a reasonable investor to take into consideration when buying shares of the company.
Signet argued in its motion for a judgement on the pleadings that its code of conduct should be viewed in the same manner, but Judge McMahon disagreed and
In her ruling, the judge wrote that statements included in a company’s code of conduct can be specific enough for investors to rely upon when deciding to invest in a company.
The judge also noted that the Singh v. Cigna decision did not mean that all company codes of conduct were now “inactionable” and highlighted the importance of context.
McMahon summarized the plaintiff’s argument, stating: “In the face of a credible accusation (by way of another lawsuit) that Signet suffered from rampant sexual harassment … defendants sought to reassure the investing public that Signet did not, in fact, have a toxic workplace.”
The judge pointed to examples of Signet’s public reassurances, including its denial of the allegations in its SEC filings; its affirmations that hiring decisions were made based on merit, that misconduct would be disciplined, and that sexual harassment could be reported without fear of retaliation; and its assurance that its senior executives were held to high standards.
“As alleged, a reasonable investor—who otherwise would be concerned about how grave allegations concerning rampant sexual misconduct might affect her investment in Signet—took defendants at their word,” McMahon wrote. “As alleged, their word was not truthful.”
Signet’s attorneys requested last Tuesday that the judge reconsider due to alleged factual errors, including errors about when the code of conduct was published in relation to the Jock case.
McMahon denied that motion Thursday, stating that the court did not rely on factual inaccuracies or mischaracterizations.
“The problem for defendants is that …. Signet’s codes of conduct and ethics—again, reincorporated by reference in Signet’s SEC filings and posted on Signet’s website after Jock was filed—touted certain values and practices that constitute the exact opposite of what the company allegedly valued and practiced,” she wrote.
The securities fraud case against Signet is still in pre-trial proceedings and the court has not officially certified it as a class action.
Signet Jewelers declined to comment on the judge’s ruling, saying it does not comment on pending legal matters.
The investors’ counsel did not respond to request for comment.
The Latest

The Florida independent expanded its store from 8,000 to 14,000 square feet, fulfilling the vision of its late co-founder, Jim Dunn.

Sponsored by De Beers Group

How Jewelers of America’s 20 Under 40 are leading to ensure a brighter future for the jewelry industry.

The classic 5600 series G-Shock has been scaled down to about a tenth of its size, becoming a fully functioning watch ring.


The association’s annual conference and gala will take place Feb. 4, 2026, during the Tucson gem shows.

The January show will include a workshop for jewelry retailers on implementing AI to strengthen their businesses.

Roseco’s 704-page catalog showcases new lab-grown diamonds, findings, tools & more—available in print or interactive digital editions.

Fellow musician Maxx Morando proposed to the star with a chunky, cushion-cut diamond ring designed by Jacquie Aiche.

The retailer, which sells billions in fine jewelry and watches, is suing the Trump administration and U.S. Customs and Border Patrol.

Black Friday is still the most popular shopping day over the five-day holiday weekend, as per the National Retail Federation’s survey.

The historic egg, crafted for Russia's ruling family prior to the revolution, was the star of Christie’s recent auction of works by Fabergé.

The retailer offered more fashion jewelry priced under $1,000, including lab-grown diamond and men’s jewelry.

The eau de parfum is held in a fluted glass bottle that mirrors the decor of the brand’s atelier, and its cap is a nod to its “Sloan” ring.

Vivek Gadodia and Juan Kemp, who’ve been serving as interim co-CEOs since February, will continue to lead the diamond mining company.

Witt’s Jewelry in Wayne, Nebraska, is the organization’s new milestone member.

Laurs is the editor-in-chief of Gem-A’s The Journal of Gemmology and an expert on the formation of colored gemstone deposits.

The man, who has a criminal history, is suspected of being the fourth member of the four-man crew that carried out the heist.

The single-owner collection includes one of the largest offerings of Verdura jewels ever to appear at auction, said Christie’s.

Michael Helfer has taken the reins, bringing together two historic Chicago jewelry names.

During its Q3 call, CEO Efraim Grinberg discussed the deal to lower tariffs on Swiss-made watches, watch market trends, and more.

Rosior’s high jewelry cocktail ring with orange sapphires and green diamonds is the perfect Thanksgiving accessory.

The “Embrace Your True Colors” campaign features jewels with a vibrant color palette and poetry by Grammy-nominated artist Aja Monet.

Luxury veteran Alejandro Cuellar has stepped into the role at the Italian fine jewelry brand.

The company gave awards to four students at the Namibia University of Science & Technology, including one who is a Grandview Klein employee.

She is remembered as an artist who loved her craft and was devoted to her faith, her friends, and her family.

It joins the company’s other manufacturing facilities globally, including in India, Botswana, and Namibia.



















