MajorsOct 29, 2020
LVMH Snags Tiffany at Lower PriceMajorsMar 24, 2021
The Tiffany v. Costco Battle Wages On
Now returned to a lower court, the jeweler and the big-box retailer are locking horns over damages and Tiffany’s right to a jury trial.
Tiffany and Costco’s fight over the term “Tiffany Setting” continues, with the two battling it out over punitive damages and a jury trial. (Photo ® Tiffany & Co.)
New York—The battle wages on between Tiffany and Costco in what is a formative case for the jewelry industry regarding the use of the term “Tiffany setting.”
Tiffany & Co. first took Costco Wholesale Corp. to court in 2013, suing the big-box retailer in New York federal court for trademark infringement, counterfeiting and unfair business practices for selling rings in its stores labeled as “Tiffany” that were not made by Tiffany.
Costco filed a countersuit, claiming the term “Tiffany setting” had become genericized and could be used by any company to describe a ring with multiple, slender prongs holding a single stone. It asked the court to invalidate any federal trademark registrations that would prevent other retailers from using the term “Tiffany setting.”
A federal judge ruled in Tiffany’s favor in 2015, granting the jeweler’s motion for summary judgment (a judgment entered by the court without a full trial) in the case.
A jury decided on damages, ordering Costco to pay Tiffany $5.5 million for unlawful profits ($3.7 million in direct profits and $1.8 million for additional benefits derived from the ring sales) and $8.25 million in punitive damages.
The judge trebled the $3.7 million to $11 million, bringing the total amount Costco was to pay Tiffany to $21 million.
Last August, however, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the summary judgment on appeal from Costco.
The judges ruled unanimously that if a jury had heard the case, “reasonable” jurors could find Costco’s use of the word “Tiffany” wasn’t likely to confuse customers or make them think Tiffany had produced or endorsed the rings.
The appeals court sent the case back to the district court, where Tiffany and Costco are now at odds over punitive damages and the issue of a jury.
Related stories will be right here …
Tiffany & Co. first took Costco Wholesale Corp. to court in 2013, suing the big-box retailer in New York federal court for trademark infringement, counterfeiting and unfair business practices for selling rings in its stores labeled as “Tiffany” that were not made by Tiffany.
Costco filed a countersuit, claiming the term “Tiffany setting” had become genericized and could be used by any company to describe a ring with multiple, slender prongs holding a single stone. It asked the court to invalidate any federal trademark registrations that would prevent other retailers from using the term “Tiffany setting.”
A federal judge ruled in Tiffany’s favor in 2015, granting the jeweler’s motion for summary judgment (a judgment entered by the court without a full trial) in the case.
A jury decided on damages, ordering Costco to pay Tiffany $5.5 million for unlawful profits ($3.7 million in direct profits and $1.8 million for additional benefits derived from the ring sales) and $8.25 million in punitive damages.
The judge trebled the $3.7 million to $11 million, bringing the total amount Costco was to pay Tiffany to $21 million.
Last August, however, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the summary judgment on appeal from Costco.
The judges ruled unanimously that if a jury had heard the case, “reasonable” jurors could find Costco’s use of the word “Tiffany” wasn’t likely to confuse customers or make them think Tiffany had produced or endorsed the rings.
The appeals court sent the case back to the district court, where Tiffany and Costco are now at odds over punitive damages and the issue of a jury.
On Feb. 12, Costco filed a motion in limine seeking to prevent a jury trial in the case and blocking Tiffany from seeking punitive damages on grounds the jeweler needs to prove lost profits (which it is not seeking in the case) before it can ask for punitive damages.
Tiffany fired back earlier this month, arguing the district court has ruled multiple times—a total of six before this, in fact—that punitive damages are available to it under New York law and that “nothing material” has changed about the case since those prior rulings.
The court also previously determined that Tiffany is entitled to a jury and, the jeweler argued in its March 12 memo opposing the motion, one is needed to determine damages in the case.
The now LVMH-owned jeweler also pointed out Costco itself asked for the case to be presented to a jury when it filed its appeal.
Tiffany fired back earlier this month, arguing the district court has ruled multiple times—a total of six before this, in fact—that punitive damages are available to it under New York law and that “nothing material” has changed about the case since those prior rulings.
The court also previously determined that Tiffany is entitled to a jury and, the jeweler argued in its March 12 memo opposing the motion, one is needed to determine damages in the case.
The now LVMH-owned jeweler also pointed out Costco itself asked for the case to be presented to a jury when it filed its appeal.
When, or if, another trial might take place remains unclear.
According to a joint status report filed March 12, Tiffany will not consent to a virtual trial, but said it could be ready for an in-person trial by July, if one can be held safely by then.
Court papers also indicate a settlement is not out of the question.
The two parties had a settlement discussion prior to the case going to trial in 2016 and have had additional discussions since the ruling on the appeal. Those discussions are continuing.
Tiffany v. Costco is filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
According to a joint status report filed March 12, Tiffany will not consent to a virtual trial, but said it could be ready for an in-person trial by July, if one can be held safely by then.
Court papers also indicate a settlement is not out of the question.
The two parties had a settlement discussion prior to the case going to trial in 2016 and have had additional discussions since the ruling on the appeal. Those discussions are continuing.
Tiffany v. Costco is filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
More on Majors
The Latest
GradingMar 06, 2026
Tom Moses Leaving GIA After Nearly 50 YearsMoses, who started at GIA’s Santa Monica lab in 1976, will leave the Gemological Institute of America in May.
Lab-GrownMar 06, 2026
Charles & Colvard Files for Bankruptcy, Citing Price PressuresIncreased competition, falling lab-grown diamond and moissanite prices, and the rising cost of gold took a toll on the moissanite maker.
CollectionsMar 06, 2026
Zome’s ‘Solara’ Earrings Embody Celestial BeautyThe earrings, our Piece of the Week, feature pink tourmalines as planets orbiting around an aquamarine center set in 18-karat rose gold.
Brought to you by
Is This You? Every Jeweler Has This Problem; We Have the Solution.Every jeweler faces the same challenge: helping customers protect what they love. Here’s the solution designed for today’s jewelry business.
Policies & IssuesMar 05, 2026
Tariffs to Increase to 15% This Week, Treasury Secretary Says Also, a federal judge has ordered that companies that paid tariffs implemented under the IEEPA are entitled to refunds.
Weekly QuizMar 05, 2026
This Week’s QuizTest your jewelry news knowledge by answering these questions.
CollectionsMar 05, 2026
Common Era Honors ‘Difficult Women’ in CollectionThe ever-growing collection, which just expanded with the addition of Olga of Kyiv, features cameos of 12 women from history.
TrendsMar 05, 2026
Engagement Ring Trends 2026: What’s In, and WhyWe asked a jewelry historian, designer, bridal director, and wedding expert what’s trending in engagement rings. Here’s what they said.
Brought to you by
DCA Enters a New Chapter in Jewelry EducationWith refreshed branding, a new website, updated courses, and a pathway for growth, DCA is dedicated to supporting retail staff development.
Events & AwardsMar 05, 2026
AGS Announces Conclave 2026 Speaker LineupThe annual event will be held in Orlando, Florida, from Sept. 14-17.
TrendsMar 05, 2026
Caitríona Balfe Fronts Only Natural Diamonds CoverThe “Outlander” star modeled for the digital cover of the magazine’s spring issue, which features a story on her relationship with jewelry.
MajorsMar 04, 2026
Michael M Opens First StoreBeverly Hills was chosen as the location for the brand’s first store, designed as a “private residence for modern monarchs.”
Policies & IssuesMar 04, 2026
Luxury Brands Temporarily Shutter Middle East StoresKering, Apple, and other retailers have reportedly temporarily closed stores in the Middle East region in light of the recent conflicts.
EditorsMar 04, 2026
Q&A: Brilliant Earth’s CEO on the New Beverly Hills StoreBeth Gerstein discusses the vibe of the new store, what customers want when fine jewelry shopping today, and the details of “Date Night.”
Events & AwardsMar 04, 2026
JIS Miami Spring Show to Feature New Gifts Pavilion, Pop-Up Trends TalksNearly half of buyers are prioritizing silver and fashion collections this season, organizers said.
TrendsMar 04, 2026
Spinelli Kilcollin Rides Free In Year of the Horse CampaignThe “Live Now. Polish Later.” campaign features equestrians wearing the brand’s jewels while galloping across the icy plains of Kazakhstan.
MajorsMar 04, 2026
LeachGarner Names New Brand DirectorThe precious metals provider has promoted Jennifer Ashworth to the role.
Events & AwardsMar 03, 2026
Johnny Nelson Wins David Yurman Gem Awards GrantNelson will be honored as the inaugural grant winner at the Gem Awards gala on March 13.
SourcingMar 03, 2026
7 Trends That Could Define the Diamond Industry’s FutureExperts from India weigh in the politics, policies, and market dynamics for diamantaires to monitor in 2026 and beyond.
MajorsMar 03, 2026
Swiss Refiner Completes Acquisition of Gannon & ScottThe American precious metals refiner’s day-to-day operations remain the same post-acquisition.
TrendsMar 03, 2026
Amanda’s Style File: AquatopiaThese aquamarine jewels channel the calming energy of the March birthstone.
Events & AwardsMar 03, 2026
AGTA Adds Another New Category for SpectrumThe “Innovative Design” category and award will debut in the Spectrum division of this year’s AGTA Spectrum & Cutting Edge Awards.
EditorsMar 02, 2026
Jewelry at the Actor Awards: Reimagining Hollywood GlamourDiamond jewelry was the star of the event formerly known as the SAG Awards.
SurveysMar 02, 2026
Consumer Confidence Edges Up in FebruaryConsumers were somewhat less worried about the future, though concerns about rising prices and politics remained.
Events & AwardsMar 02, 2026
JVC to Honor Rebecca Foerster at Annual LuncheonFoerster is this year’s Stanley Schechter Award recipient.
Events & AwardsMar 02, 2026
JFC Names 2026 ‘Facets’ Honorees Sponsorships and tickets to the annual fundraising event, set for May 31, are available now.
CrimeFeb 27, 2026
Man Charged in Murders of Father, Son Jewelers in ChicagoChicago police and members of the U.S. Marshals Service tracked down the 35-year-old suspect earlier this week in St. Louis.
SourcingFeb 27, 2026
South African Diamond Mine Closes Amid Search for Missing WorkersOwners of the Ekapa Mine reportedly filed for liquidation about a week after a mudslide trapped five workers who have yet to be found.
