Majors

The Tiffany v. Costco Battle Wages On

MajorsMar 24, 2021

The Tiffany v. Costco Battle Wages On

Now returned to a lower court, the jeweler and the big-box retailer are locking horns over damages and Tiffany’s right to a jury trial.

Tiffany and Costco’s fight over the term “Tiffany Setting” continues, with the two battling it out over punitive damages and a jury trial. (Photo ® Tiffany & Co.)
New York—The battle wages on between Tiffany and Costco in what is a formative case for the jewelry industry regarding the use of the term “Tiffany setting.”

Tiffany & Co. first took Costco Wholesale Corp. to court in 2013, suing the big-box retailer in New York federal court for trademark infringement, counterfeiting and unfair business practices for selling rings in its stores labeled as “Tiffany” that were not made by Tiffany.

Costco filed a countersuit, claiming the term “Tiffany setting” had become genericized and could be used by any company to describe a ring with multiple, slender prongs holding a single stone. It asked the court to invalidate any federal trademark registrations that would prevent other retailers from using the term “Tiffany setting.”

A federal judge ruled in Tiffany’s favor in 2015, granting the jeweler’s motion for summary judgment (a judgment entered by the court without a full trial) in the case.

A jury decided on damages, ordering Costco to pay Tiffany $5.5 million for unlawful profits ($3.7 million in direct profits and $1.8 million for additional benefits derived from the ring sales) and $8.25 million in punitive damages.

The judge trebled the $3.7 million to $11 million, bringing the total amount Costco was to pay Tiffany to $21 million

Last August, however, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the summary judgment on appeal from Costco. 

The judges ruled unanimously that if a jury had heard the case, “reasonable” jurors could find Costco’s use of the word “Tiffany” wasn’t likely to confuse customers or make them think Tiffany had produced or endorsed the rings.

The appeals court sent the case back to the district court, where Tiffany and Costco are now at odds over punitive damages and the issue of a jury. 

 Related stories will be right here … 
On Feb. 12, Costco filed a motion in limine seeking to prevent a jury trial in the case and blocking Tiffany from seeking punitive damages on grounds the jeweler needs to prove lost profits (which it is not seeking in the case) before it can ask for punitive damages. 

Tiffany fired back earlier this month, arguing the district court has ruled multiple times—a total of six before this, in fact—that punitive damages are available to it under New York law and that “nothing material” has changed about the case since those prior rulings. 

The court also previously determined that Tiffany is entitled to a jury and, the jeweler argued in its March 12 memo opposing the motion, one is needed to determine damages in the case.  

The now LVMH-owned jeweler also pointed out Costco itself asked for the case to be presented to a jury when it filed its appeal.
When, or if, another trial might take place remains unclear. 

According to a joint status report filed March 12, Tiffany will not consent to a virtual trial, but said it could be ready for an in-person trial by July, if one can be held safely by then.

Court papers also indicate a settlement is not out of the question.

The two parties had a settlement discussion prior to the case going to trial in 2016 and have had additional discussions since the ruling on the appeal. Those discussions are continuing. 

Tiffany v. Costco is filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. 
Michelle Graffis the editor-in-chief at National Jeweler, directing the publication’s coverage both online and in print.

The Latest

FinancialsSep 17, 2021
Consumer Resilience Buoys August Retail Sales

U.S. retail sales rose last month in spite of the rising Delta variant and supply chain constraints.

CollectionsSep 17, 2021
Sydney Evan Celebrates 20 Years with Capsule Collection

It showcases the brand’s signature motifs in new ways.

Events & AwardsSep 17, 2021
Here’s This Year’s Robert M. Shipley Award Winner

Plus, the winners of the many other awards presented at AGS Conclave.

Brought to you by
What is your Health Care Coverage Strategy?

Health care coverage is a big expense for small businesses - find out how to lower costs long-term instead of every 12 months.

CollectionsSep 17, 2021
Piece of the Week: Maggi Simpkins’ Powerful Pink Diamond

It’s part of Sotheby’s “Black & Brilliant” sale, opening today.

Weekly QuizSep 16, 2021
This Week's Quiz
Test your knowledge of jewelry news from the week of Sept. 13-17, 2021.
Take the Quiz
TrendsSep 16, 2021
Amanda’s Style File: Fun With Geometric Shapes

The clean lines of these 15 designs feel fresh for fall.

SourcingSep 16, 2021
Diamond Jewelry Demand Continues to Fuel Rough Sales

De Beers noted how strong the Vegas shows were, while Alrosa grappled with supply issues in August.

Brought to you by
3 Reasons Your Store Should Add An Estate Category

Increase profit margins, generate traffic and attract new customers with an Estate assortment by partnering with Windsor Jewelers, Inc.

Events & AwardsSep 16, 2021
Gem Legacy Is Having Another Benefit Auction to Celebrate 3 Years

All proceeds will go toward its miner toolkit initiative.

×